November 2008 Archives

Defining Natural-Born Citizen

| 420 Comments

“The common law of England is not the common law of these States.” —George Mason


What might the phrase “natural-born citizen” of the United States imply under the U.S. Constitution? The phrase has always been obscure due to the lack of any single authoritative source to confer in order to understand the condition of citizenship the phrase recognizes. Learning what the phrase might have meant following the Declaration of Independence, and the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, requires detective work. As with all detective work, eliminating the usual suspects from the beginning goes a long way in quickly solving a case.

What Natural-Born Citizen Could Not Mean

Could a natural-born citizen simply mean citizenship due to place of birth?

Unlikely in the strict sense because we know one can be native born and yet not a native born citizen of this country. There were even disputes whether anyone born within the District of Columbia or in the territories were born citizens of the United States (they were generally referred to as “inhabitants” instead.) National Government could make no “territorial allegiance” demands within the several States because as Madison explained it, the “powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State.”

Jurisdiction over citizenship via birth within the several States was part of the “ordinary course of affairs” of the States that only local laws could affect. Early acts of Naturalization recognized the individual State Legislatures as the only authority who could make anyone a citizen of a State. Framer James Wilson said, “a citizen of the United States is he, who is a citizen of at least some one state in the Union.” These citizens of each State were united together through Article IV, Sec. II of the U.S. Constitution, and thus, no act of Congress was required to make citizens of the individual States citizens of the United States.

Prior to the Revolutionary War place of birth within the dominions of the crown was the principle criterion for establishing perpetual allegiance and citizenship. After independence perpetual allegiance was abandoned and considered a dirty word.

Recent Comments

  • JC In Texas: “This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of read more
  • Randy King: In their 1982 ruling regarding same sex marriage and immigration read more
  • 68.93.157.177: A child born to alien parents who are illegally present read more
  • Equal Protection is Important: Interesting argument, but the very fact that a “straight” person read more
  • J Sebastian: Actually the flaw in your argument is the equivocation of read more
  • John: Thanks. I have some follow-up questions, but there’s no need read more
  • J. Aldridge: (a) can states treat race and gender as qualifications for read more
  • sk1951: So where do the morality laws go in this unholy read more
  • Los: Indians were not considered being nor recognized nor granted citizenship read more
  • Alan: It is not racism, it is a desire to see read more
federalists